top of page
  • TikTok
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Search

Ponsonby - Speed & Agility Program (Tuesday Ages 8-10) - Testing Results - Term 1, 2026

  • 5 hours ago
  • 2 min read

At the completion of our Term 1 program, athletes in the Ponsonby 8–10 group completed post-testing to compare against their Week 1 baseline.


This testing provides insight into the development of key athletic qualities, including:


  • Sprint performance (20m)

  • Change of direction (5–10–5)

  • Lower-body power (Broad Jump)

  • Explosive power (CMJ Vertical Jump)


All results below show Week 1 → Week 8 values, along with percentage change across the program (positive % indicates improvement).


How to Interpret Results


  • Sprint & agility: Lower time = improvement

  • Broad Jump & CMJ: Higher value = improvement


Results Table

Athlete

20m Sprint

5–10–5

Broad Jump

CMJ

Billie H

4.281 → 4.392 (−2.59%)

6.41 → 6.671 (−4.07%)

1.19 → 1.615 (+35.71%)

27.9 → 32.0 (+14.70%)

Brooklyn F

4.086 → 4.557 (−11.53%)

6.33 → 6.493 (−2.57%)

1.32 → 1.40 (+6.06%)

32.0 → 30.0 (−6.25%)

Standout Performances


Billie H


  • Broad Jump: +35.71%

  • CMJ: +14.70%


A standout improvement in lower-body power, with significant gains in both horizontal and vertical jumping ability. This reflects improved coordination, force production, and confidence in explosive movements.


Brooklyn F


  • Broad Jump: +6.06%


Demonstrated improvement in power output, with continued development in jumping ability and coordination.


Key Insights


Power Development


The most significant improvements across this group were seen in lower-body power, particularly:


  • Broad Jump improvements across both athletes

  • CMJ improvements, especially for Billie


At this stage of development, this reflects:


  • Improved coordination and timing

  • Increased confidence in movement

  • Better ability to apply force into the ground


Sprint & Agility Variability


Sprint and agility results showed some variability, which is expected in younger athletes.

This can be influenced by:


  • Coordination changes as athletes develop

  • Learning new movement patterns

  • Variability in effort and familiarity with testing


At ages 8–10, improvements in movement quality are often more important than immediate improvements in sprint times.


Movement Development


Across the program, improvements were observed in:


  • Running mechanics and posture

  • Braking and change of direction control

  • Jumping and landing technique


These are critical foundations that will support future improvements in speed and performance.


Important Context


While testing provides useful objective data, athlete development is not assessed purely on numbers.


At this stage, the focus is on:


  • Developing coordination and movement skills

  • Building confidence in athletic movements

  • Learning correct technique


Testing results can also be influenced by:


  • Growth and maturation

  • Familiarity with testing

  • Day-to-day variability


For this reason, results should always be viewed within the broader context of long-term development.


Final Note


This group has made positive progress across the term, particularly in developing power and movement confidence.


These improvements provide a strong foundation for future development in speed, agility, and overall athletic performance

If you would like individual feedback or guidance on next steps, please feel free to get in touch.


UNCAPD Sports Performance Academy

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page