Ponsonby - Speed & Agility Program (Tuesday Ages 11-13) - Testing Results - Term 1, 2026
- 5 hours ago
- 2 min read
At the completion of our Term 1 program, athletes in the Ponsonby 11–13 group completed post-testing to compare against their Week 1 baseline.
This testing provides insight into the development of key athletic qualities, including:
Sprint performance (20m)
Change of direction (5–10–5)
Lower-body power (Broad Jump & CMJ)
Reactive strength (RSI)
All results below show Week 1 → Week 8 values, along with percentage change across the program (positive % indicates improvement).
How to Interpret Results
Sprint & agility: Lower time = improvement
Broad Jump, CMJ & RSI: Higher value = improvement
Results Table
Athlete | 20m Sprint | 5–10–5 | Broad Jump | CMJ | RSI |
Henry P | 3.479 → 3.577 (−2.82%) | 5.714 → 5.355 (+6.28%) | 1.86 → 1.93 (+3.76%) | 42.9 → 47.5 (+10.72%) | 1.17 → 1.45 (+23.93%) |
Charlie P | 3.585 → 3.744 (−4.44%) | 5.653 → 5.716 (−1.12%) | 1.92 → 1.875 (−2.34%) | 36.8 → 40.9 (+11.14%) | 1.01 → 1.69 (+67.33%) |
Eleanor L | 4.281 → 4.265 (+0.37%) | 6.977 → 6.567 (+5.88%) | 1.21 → 1.24 (+2.48%) | 26.4 → 31.0 (+17.42%) | 0.45 → 0.70 (+55.56%) |
Maanika C | 4.005 → 3.883 (+3.05%) | 5.980 → 6.079 (−1.66%) | 1.42 → 1.595 (+12.32%) | 34.0 → 34.3 (+0.88%) | 1.37 → 1.55 (+13.14%) |
Jayden L | 4.125 → 4.330 (−4.97%) | 6.317 → 6.417 (−1.58%) | 1.59 → 1.58 (−0.63%) | 31.2 → 33.0 (+5.77%) | 0.54 → 0.69 (+27.78%) |
Post-Testing Only Athlete
Athlete | 20m Sprint | 5–10–5 | Broad Jump | CMJ | RSI |
Saisha | 4.098 | 6.250 | 1.54 | 31.0 | 0.85 |
Standout Performances
Charlie P
RSI: +67.33%
CMJ: +11.14%
Significant improvement in reactive strength, indicating enhanced ability to produce and absorb force quickly — a key quality for sprinting and agility.
Eleanor L
CMJ: +17.42%
RSI: +55.56%
5–10–5: +5.88%
Strong improvements across power and agility, reflecting improved coordination and movement efficiency.
Henry P
5–10–5: +6.28%
CMJ: +10.72%
RSI: +23.93%
Well-rounded development across agility, power, and reactive strength.
Maanika C
20m Sprint: +3.05%
Broad Jump: +12.32%
Clear improvements in sprint performance and lower-body power.
Key Insights
Reactive Strength Development (RSI)
One of the most notable outcomes across the group was improvement in RSI:
Multiple athletes showed 20–60%+ improvements
Indicates improved stretch-shortening cycle efficiency
Enhances:
Sprinting ability
Agility performance
Explosive movement
Power Development (CMJ & Broad Jump)
Improvements in jumping metrics reflect:
Increased lower-body force production
Improved coordination and timing
Better movement efficiency
Agility Development (5–10–5)
Several athletes improved their change of direction performance, indicating:
Better braking mechanics
Improved body positioning
Increased control at speed
Sprint Variability
Sprint performance showed mixed results, which is expected at this stage.
This can reflect:
Technical adjustments to sprint mechanics
Coordination changes during development
Training emphasis on other qualities (e.g. strength, power)
Important Context
While testing provides valuable objective data, we do not assess athlete development based on numbers alone.
Across the program, there were clear improvements in:
Sprint mechanics and posture
Movement efficiency
Change of direction control
Jumping and landing technique
Testing outcomes can also be influenced by:
Growth and maturation
Fatigue and external training load
Familiarity with testing
Day-to-day readiness
Final Note
This group made strong progress across the term, particularly in developing:
Reactive strength
Power
Agility
These qualities form a critical foundation for long-term athletic performance.
If you would like individual feedback or guidance on next steps, please feel free to get in touch.
UNCAPD Sports Performance Academy





Comments